torstai 14. toukokuuta 2015

On the Nature of Art

Do you need an artist to make art?

(flash of genius?)

We can claim:

Making art makes an artist
as much an artist makes art,
through one the other is born
to give birth to it.

Art is deliberate creation.

(in the marble the statue
was already present to the sculptor)

BUT

Art is not a deliberate creation by an individual
aware of their role as an artist. 

(craftsman elevated by posterity!)

Someone else,
someone with authority,
needs to confirm the creation as art:

Art critic, art historian, "other" artists.

Someone who has been given this authority
by a society or a slice of it.

Only the stamp of authority creates
art out of an object,
an artist out of a person.

(social contract of art)

Art and artist are both communal creations.
An individual in isolation
can never be an artist,
their creations can never be art. 

(ouroboros?)

In the end
stand the one or those who first
came up with the idea of art,
the maker or makers
of all artists.

14.05.2015

Ei kommentteja:

Lähetä kommentti